Watch Movie Online

November 24, 2009

Old Dogs





Old Dogs (2009) Poster

Two best friends — one unlucky-in-love divorcee and the other a fun-loving bachelor — have their lives turned upside down when they’re unexpectedly charged with the care of 7-year-old twins while on the verge of the biggest business deal of their lives. The not-so-kid-savvy bachelors stumble in their efforts to take care of the twins, leading to one debacle after another, and perhaps to a new-found understanding of what’s really important in life.

Production Status: In Production/Awaiting Release
Genres: Comedy and Kids/Family
Release Date: November 25th, 2009 (wide)
MPAA Rating: PG for some mild rude humor.
Distributors:
Walt Disney Studios Distribution
Production Co.:
Tapestry Films
Studios:
Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures
Filming Locations:
Connecticut, USA
Produced in: United States

Watch This Movie
Download This Movie
Alternative downloads

This gorilla is in regards to to do to seth green what ‘old dogs’ is going to do to audiences this weekend, and it ain’t gonna be prettya

Whether or not “old dogs” were an individual, i would stab it in the face.

Millions of years from now, after western civilization has fallen and the world has ruptured and cooled and been reborn and a new life form has taken over the planet, whether or not any of them happen to stumble upon a working dvd player and a copy of “old dogs,” they’ll sum up the passing of our culture with two simple words: “good riddance. “

It is rare that i hate a film with the feverish intensity that i feel towards this one, but it hit cool much every single button for me, and by halfway through, i felt like i was going to crawl out of my skin. What i thought was going to be a mediocre family-themed comedy rather struck me as one of the most singularly vile experiences i’ve had in a theater all year. To give you an idea how wretched the film is, whether or not you take the worst robin williams film, multiply it by the worst john travolta film, and then multiply that by “wild hogs,” the last film from director walt becker, you would still end up with something better than this.

“old dogs” is the story of two ostensible adult humane beings who, confronted with spending 14 days in the presence of twin seven-year-olds, promptly go insane and get started acting in a manner which would land anybody in the real world in jail or the morgue. Deservedly. Nothing in this film resembles any recognizable conduct of any actual individual ever. At one point, bernie mac shows up as a puppeteer who in a literal sense wires robin williams up with a magical bio-rig that transforms him into. . . And i quote. . . A “human puppet” who is controlled via remote by john travolta so that williams can have a tea party with his daughter. And altho i was sliding in and out of cognizance by this point, numb from the horror, i’m almost positive a motown song plays over the resulting montage.

And that is not the worst scene in the film.

Ball shots, drug jokes, and a prolonged sequence where john travolta is transformed into the joker are just a heap of of the nightmares that await audiences this weekend. And whether or not it sounds like i’m going overboard on a harmless family comedy, that’s exactly the problem. I don’t think this shape of rubbish is harmless. I am ofttimes horrified by the message of these “family comedies,” and i think hollywood genuinely does give its most vocal critics fuel for when they assert that this town has no idea what original humane values are. I hate the sub-genre in regards to the workaholic dad who just has to learn the necessary life lesson that his occupation doesn’t matter and everything will magically work out whether or not he just spends every waking hour serving every and every whim of his children. I also hate the sub-genre of movies in which rational adults who run their own companies and who are otherwise completely capable are scaled down to simpering morons plainly by having to care for a child. “three men and a baby” is a good example of what i mean. Badly? Three adults can’t figure out in which way to diaper a baby? Genuinely? That’s comedy? It would be pathetic whether or not it happened in the real world, and yet we’re all supposed to smile and nod and just accept it as “funny. ” for me, outstanding humor comes out of recognizing something genuine in the comedy, something that i can relate to, and when i’m watching performers suddenly turn sub-moronic in the name of laughter, i find myself completely unmoved. I don’t think the truly stupid are amusing in real life when i have to cope with them, so why would i think it’s hilarious to watch talented actors play such useless sacks of skin?

There are a heap of very amusing people trapped in this one, like luis guzman and justin long, but they’re given utterly nothing to do. Matt dillon shows up in a pointless sequence involving a camping trip, and even the way scenes are edited in this film confounds me. There’s no beginning or ending to anything. It’s like scenes just get started and stop at random, like walt becker’s so bored by what’s happening that he just decides to cut to something else rather than find an organic way to wrap something up or rather than attempting to build to any sort of punchline. I can’t genuinely blame any of the actors (accept for saying yes), because there’s nothing here for them to do. There’s no way to redeem a script this creatively bankrupt. There was never any hope this would be anything but rancid.

Whether or not you truly hate your family and you’re all trapped together this weekend, and you reeeeeally want to punish them and show them just how little you value their joy, then by all means, pile into the car and rush out to find a theater playing “old dogs. ” but whether or not you have any self-respect at all, and whether or not your time and your brain cells mean anything to you, then skip it. It’s not ironically astounding. It’s not so bad it’s outstanding. It is a soul-crushing experience, causing sad feelings of gloom and inadequacy and sad, bad enough to make me retroactively wish away the careers of all involved.

November 8, 2009

Red Cliff


Red Cliff (2009) Poster

The power hungry Prime Minister-turned-General Cao Cao seeks permission from the Han dynasty Emperor to organize a southward-bound mission designed to crush two troublesome warlords that stand in his way, Liu Bei and Sun Quan. As the expedition gets under way, Cao Cao’s troops rain destruction on Liu Bei’s army, forcing the latter to retreat. Liu Bei’s military strategist Zhuge Liang knows that their only hope for survival is to form an alliance with rival warlord Sun Quan, and reaches out to Sun Quan’s trusted advisor, war hero Zhou Yu. Vastly outnumbered by Cao Cao’s fast approaching, brutal army, the rebel warlords band together to mount a heroic campaign unrivalled in history that changes the face of China forever.

Also Known As:
Chek bik
Chi bi
Romance of the Three Kingdoms
The Battle of Red Cliff
The War of the Red Cliff
Production Status: Released
Logline: An epic historical drama based on a legendary 208 A.D. battle that heralded the end of the Han Dynasty.
Genres: Action/Adventure, Art/Foreign, Drama, Adaptation and War
Running Time: 2 hrs. 28 min.
Release Date: November 20th, 2009 (limited)
MPAA Rating: R for sequences of epic warfare.
Distributors:
Magnolia Pictures
Production Co.:
China Film Group Corp., Summit Entertainment, LLC, CMC Entertainment Group, ShowBox Entertainment, Chengtian Entertainment, Avex Entertainment, Taewon Entertainment, Lion Rock Productions
Filming Locations:
Beijing, China
Produced in: China

object

Dare


Dare (2009) Poster

In high school, what kind of person did you dare to be: risk-taking and lustful, melancholy and confused or simply safe and over-achieving? Dare follows three teenagers through their last semester of school: Alexa, the smart, good girl who longs to break out of her shell; Ben, the lonely outsider dealing with his sexuality; and Johnny, the rich, seemingly perfect bad-boy who has everything. In a last-ditch effort to shake things up before graduating and start living as adults, this unlikely trio take the biggest risks of their lives. In the process, they learn no one is exactly who they appear to be.

Production Status: In Production/Awaiting Release
Logline: Three privileged high school seniors decide they can no longer ignore their deepest needs and take the biggest risk of their lives.
Genres: Drama
Running Time: 1 hr. 30 min.
Release Date: November 13th, 2009 (NY/LA)
MPAA Rating: R for sexual content, language and alcohol use – all involving teens.
Distributors:
Image Group Entertainment
Production Co.:
Next Wednesday Productions, Gigantic Pictures
Filming Locations:
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Produced in: United States

object

The Blind Side


The Blind Side (2009) Poster

Michael Oher, a homeless African-American youngster from a broken home, is taken in by the Touhys, a well-to-do white family who help him fulfill his potential. At the same time, Oher’s presence in the Touhys’ lives leads them to some insightful self-discoveries of their own. Living in his new environment, the teen faces a completely different set of challenges to overcome. As a football player and student, Oher works hard and, with the help of his coaches and adopted family, becomes an All-American offensive left tackle.

Also Known As:
Blindside
Production Status: In Production/Awaiting Release
Genres: Comedy, Drama, Adaptation, Biopic and Sports
Release Date: November 20th, 2009 (wide)
MPAA Rating: PG-13 for one scene involving brief violence, drug and sexual references.
Distributors:
Warner Bros. Pictures Distribution
Production Co.:
Gil Netter Productions, Alcon Entertainment
Studios:
Warner Bros. Pictures
Financiers:
Alcon Entertainment
Filming Locations:
Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Decatur, Georgia, USA
Produced in: United States

object

Oh My God

Filed under: Movies online, Release — Tags: , , , , , , , , , , — Kate @ 11:38 pm

Oh My God (2009) Poster

As religion and its effects on the world continue to dominate the headlines, this documentary examines worldwide perceptions of God and features participation from celebrities such as Hugh Jackman, Ringo Starr, David Copperfield, Seal, Sir Bob Geldof, Baz Luhrmann, Her Roayl Highness Michael of Kent and Jack Thompson, among others. Over three years, filmmaker Peter Rodgers traveled across 23 countries asking the simple question, “What is God?,” to see what this entity that goes by the name of God means to individuals — from children; to religious leaders; to celebrities; to fanatics and to the common man. The results of this journey are sometimes predictable, and sometimes surprising.

Also Known As:
Oh My G-D
Oh My God
Production Status: In Production/Awaiting Release
Logline: Explores the relationship between man and what man thinks God is, irrespective of religious or geographic boundaries.
Genres: Documentary and Politics/Religion
Release Date: November 13th, 2009 (limited)
MPAA Rating: Not Rated
Distributors:
Mitropoulos Films
Production Co.:
Anonymous Content
Produced in: United States
ive Peter Rodger credit for audacity: In Oh My God, the writer, director, producer, and DP jets around the world, traveling from Africa to India, Japan to Israel, to ask an assortment of religious leaders and extremists, everyday people, and celebrity ringers that vague, if endlessly provocative question, “What is God?” Or rather don’t, since what seems like an audacious endeavoras well as a genuine inquiry borne of personal uncertaintydissolves into empty exercise when we realize that Rodger is simply shaping his material to accord with a predetermined viewpoint. Not that, throughout his travels, the filmmaker doesn’t uncover a multiplicity of perspectives, nor even illuminate some of the reasons behind mankind’s essential need to believe, it’s just that those opinions that don’t agree with the final assessment of several of Rodger’s subjects (including Ringo Starr) that “God is love” are given short shrift.

Appearing on screen, Rodger claims he made his film because he couldn’t understand how an institution that fundamentally preaches tolerance can become such a force for hatred and violence. But rather than show a similar tolerance for his own subjects, he arranges their testimony in such a way to promote the idea that God is an essentially positive presence (or at least concept) that teaches us to do good and that religious conflict has nothing to do with the man upstairs; it’s based on either a desire for land and power or a misreading of scripture. Not such a bad conclusion but hardly the only one a thinking person is likely to reach. And, in Oh My God, those who disagree with the party line are summarily contradicted.

When Rodger visits Israel’s occupied territories, his sunny optimism about the future of Jewish-Arab relations (illustrated by footage of leaders of both parties walking literally hand-in-hand) is temporarily disturbed by an American rabbi expressing doubts about a Palestinian state according Jews the same rights Israel grants people of other religions. But only temporarily, since the director immediately cuts in footage of another rabbi happily living in an Arab state to refute him. Similarly, when Rodger visits with a jihadist in an “undisclosed location,” he challenges his subject to locate the passage in the Koran that explains how non-Muslims will burn in hell. As the man searches the text, Rodger edits the footage into a flippant montage scored to bubbly pop musicthe better to ridicule the man. Then when the Muslim does locate the passage, the filmmaker cuts to an American Islamic leader to explain (rather unconvincingly, it seems) how the jihadist has misinterpreted the text. No doubt the militant’s attitude is regrettablyand dangerouslyblinkered, but so is Rodger’s. Why even bother letting the man speak in the first place when you just plan on haughtily contradicting him in a display of your own superiority?

Actually the most audacious thing about the film may be its appallingly bad taste. Rodger employs questionable rhetorical strategies so frequently that it doesn’t make sense to label them lapses of judgment; after a while, they seem like his regular working method. After all, this is a man who thinks nothing of posing fatuous questions about God to Katrina survivors and children suffering from cancer in order to prove the existence of faith in the most unlikely situations, a man who lovingly turns his camera on Seal as the singer sentimentally equates the existence of a higher power with the pictures of his family he keeps in a locket, and a director who dresses his film in an assaultive aesthetic that makes sure we’re not granted much leisure to contemplate his subjects’ words. Never content to simply let an interviewee speak, Rodger continually cuts away from his subject, assembling video and audio montages (the latter of which often turn parts of a talking head’s speech into something like a dance remix) to undercut the contemplative pretense of his project.

But it’s not like most of the people Rodger talks to are dispensing remarkable insights anyway; the religious leaders have a slight leg up on the celebrities, but they’re hardly much more enlightening. Still, at least one subjectmusician Bob Geldofrefuses to play along. After asserting his absolute atheism, he questions his very inclusion in the project. “You asked me to do the film,” he tells Rodger. “I have a very pedestrian point of view.” At least he admits it.


Fantastic Mr. Fox


Fantastic Mr. Fox (2009) Poster

Mr and Mrs Fox live an idyllic home life with their son Ash and visiting young nephew Kristopherson. But after 12 years, the bucolic existence proves too much for Mr Fox’s wild animal instincts. Soon he slips back into his old ways as a sneaky chicken thief and in doing so, endangers not only his beloved family, but the whole animal community. Trapped underground and with not enough food to go around, the animals band together to fight against the evil Farmers — Boggis, Bunce and Bean — who are determined to capture the audacious, fantastic Mr Fox at any cost

Production Status: In Production/Awaiting Release
Genres: Action/Adventure, Comedy, Animation and Adaptation
Running Time: 1 hr. 28 min.
Release Date: November 25th, 2009 (wide)
MPAA Rating: PG for action, smoking and slang humor.
Distributors:
Fox Searchlight Pictures
Production Co.:
Scott Rudin Productions, American Empirical Pictures
Studios:
20th Century Fox Animation, New Regency Productions
Financiers:
Co-Financier: Regency Enterprises, Indian Paintbrush
Produced in: United States

« The Men Who Stare at Goats |Main| Uncertainty »

Fantastic Mr. Fox

Fantastic Mr Fox Poster Although he might argue against it Wes Anderson, famous for his quirky sense of absurdist humor, seems to have found his forte in animation vis a vis Roald Dahl’s 1970 children’s book. With a script co-written by Anderson and Noah Baumbach, Anderson creates a magical stop-animation world inhabited by a fox family, various other woodland creatures, and a group of nasty human farmers who don’t take kindly to having their livestock and cider stolen. George Clooney applies his signature leathery voice to Mr. Fox, a snappily-dressed family guy whose animal nature sits at direct odds to his family’s safety in their peaceful foxhole. Meryl Streep voices Mr. Fox’s even-keeled wife, and Jason Schwartzman speaks for the couple’s bratty son Ash, who tries to compete with his athletically-prone cousin Kristofferson (Eric Anderson) who has come to stay with them. The nearby industrial farms of Boggis, Bunch, and Bean prove too much of a temptation for Mr. Fox whose burglary plan brings down more human wrath than he is prepared to handle. There are significant coincidences between Spike Jonze’s “Where the Wild Things Are” and Anderson’s “Fantastic Mr. Fox” in that both stories feature themes of an untamed animal nature in all of us. To that narrative end Anderson’s film better satisfies, perhaps because Dahl’s book presented a more developed source material than Maurice Sendak’s book. Anderson’s lavish attention to visual detail supports the dry wit on display in a highly original animated film geared to appeal equally to adults and children.

Rated PG. 88 mins. (B+) (Four Stars)

Posted by Cole Smithey on
November 8, 2009 in Animation | Permalink

Save to del.icio.us | Digg This

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c2b7953ef012875641238970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Fantastic Mr. Fox:

Comments

Post a comment

2012 movie

Filed under: Movies online, Release — Kate @ 10:58 pm


Never before has a date in history been so significant to so many cultures, so many religions, scientists, and governments. 2012 is an epic adventure about a global cataclysm that brings an end to the world and tells of the heroic struggle of the survivors.
Size matters: What you get on the big screen is not one movie for the price of one, but a pastiche of all the disaster movies made in Hollywood over the past four decades or so, including a tribute to Emmerich’s own pictures, the blockbusters “Independence Day” and “The Day After Tomorrow.”

Punctuated by eight or nine big, expensive CGI set-pieces, the shamelessly derivative narrative makes sure to include every possible catastrophe imaginable, setting the action scenes on the air, under water, on the ground—you name it. In the course of the film, the hero (played by John Cusack) drives every vehicle imaginable through fire, earth, ash clouds, earthquakes, and water.

The movie unfolds as an adventure ride, sort of a day spent at Disneyland, sampling all the attractions you can stomach, without taking a break or a pause to breathe. Opinions will differ as to what extent “2012″ is a pleasurable joy ride, or an endless series of crashes, earthquakes, and explosions. Throughout, intentionally or unintentionally, the movie walks a fine line between the darkly humorous and the outrageously risible. The dialogue needs to be heard to be believed.

The film’s PG-13 rating suggests that it was made for the entire members of the family, globally. The story’s politics are so calculated and vague that the film should not upset any citizen, no matter what his or her ideological credo is.

Ditto for race: The yarn carefully balances its characters in terms of ethnicity and nationality (guess who’s the big villain?). With a nod to our new administration, the sensitive, populist president is black (Danny Glover), and the heroic protagonist, a conscientious scientist, is also black (Chiwetel Ejiofor).

According to reports, the budget of “2012″ exceeds $260 million. Clearly, the money was not spent on the talent, for the movie lacks major stars, instead going for gifted and appealing actors, such as John Cusack and Chiwetel Ejiofor in the leads, and Amanda Peet, Oliver Platt, Thandie Newton, Danny Glover, Woody Harrelson, and Tom McCarthy in secondary roles.

Credited to Emmerich and Harald Kloser, the banal, cliché-ridden narrative is presumably based on prevalent mythology. Centuries ago, the Maya left their calendar with a clear end date, 2012, with all its implications and ramifications. Since then, astrologists have discovered it, numerologists have found patterns that predict it, geologists say the earth is overdue for it, and even government scientists cannot deny the cataclysm of epic proportions that awaits the earth in 2012.

“2012″ takes to an extreme the notion that every civilization on Earth has a flood myth, according to which things are going wrong, society isn’t working anymore, and the planet needs to start over. Some people get a second chance to begin a new society with a new culture. The Mayan calendar is set to reach the end of its 13th cycle on December 21, 2012; nothing follows that date.

The filmmakers would like us to believe that “2012″ contains significant philosophical and political elements, but essentially it’s an apocalyptic sci-fi-disaster-actioner, obeying all the rules of this hybrid of genres. While you could predict quite accurately who will survive (and who will perish), the only questions are, at what point in the story they’ll be killed off and under what specific circumstances.

John Cusack stars as Jackson Curtis, a writer whose devotion to his novel, which failed, broke up his marriage, leaving his family of two children in flux. Ex-wife Kate (Amanda Peet) maintains friendly contact with Jackson but has long tired of competing with his work for his attention. A failed author, trying to keep his life together, Jackson works as a limousine driver by day.

Kate is now living with a sensitive and considerate boyfriend (Tom McCarthy, likable), who’s adored by the kids; they prefer his company and trust him better than their own dad. We all know that at heart, Jackson is a loyal dad, but he needs to prove that, and the only way to prove it is to do everything and anything to save his family in times of crisis. And, oh boy, does the catalogue-like yarn offer him crises to overcome.

The central story is presented from two points of view, those in the know, who realize the impact of the cataclysmic events that await the earth, and those in the no, individuals who remain in the dark. Standing in for the average citizen, Jackson is a civilian who stumbles into the news that the world as we know it is coming to an end.

Jackson’s everyman perspective is counter-balanced by that of the “experts” inside Washington’s power halls, as seen through the eyes of Adrian Helmsley, a government scientist who makes the fast track to the inner-workings of the White House when he discovers a sequence of changes in the earth’s core, crust and atmosphere. As the counterpart to Jackson, Adrian knows from the beginning what is going to happen and what the government plans to do, but throughout, he has doubts and second thoughts, wondering whether this particular plan is really the right one to do.

Superficially borrowing from news headlines, the story depicts a plan at the very highest echelons of the world’s governments. The shrewd politicos realize that they will not be able to save the entire human race, but they will be able to save some, and those few will have the chance to begin society anew.

Take our own bright and humanistic President, Thomas Wilson, who’s quick to understand the crisis the world is about to face. Rational, he’s determined to prevent mass hysteria and paranoia by keeping the information secret. The president’s chief science advisor, Adrian Helmsley has managed to decode the earth’s messages and is determined to do what he can to help as many people as possible.

These two men are contrasted with Carl Anheuser (Oliver Platt), the president’s chief of staff, who might be pompous and quick-tempered, but is equally determined to see some members of society survive. Problem is, Anheuser favors the upper class, the rich, powerful, and famous.

The organizing principle of the multi-national, multi generational text is that of fathers and sons, and in one case, father and daughter, President Wilson and his daughter Laura. Early on, Laura (Thandie Newton) is shocked to find out what her father’s government has hidden from the world. Laura then faces another shocking revelation. Leading the task to procure cherished works of art (”Mona Lisa”) for preservation, Laura is unaware of the true nature of her assignment until the disaster becomes imminent. Rest assured that before long daddy-President Wilson will explain to her his motives and ask for forgiveness.

It seems that the only man outside the government with any clue as to what is about to happen is the radio host and crazy prophet Charlie Frost (Woody Harrelson, over the top), who broadcasts his predictions to anyone who will listen, until he himself goes up in flames in a sequence that would make Cecil B. DeMille (”The Ten Commandments”) jealous.

In the course of the film, there are numerous scenes, some lasting only seconds, in which fathers and sons communicate, or try to communicate, in person or via telephone and computer, aiming to reach a better understanding of each other.

In recent disaster and action movies, the fun derived from seeing Gotham and its architectural monuments destroyed. This flick, takes the saga back to L.A. (where “Earthquake” was set) and to other parts of California (”Towering Inferno” was set in San Francisco). As the earth’s plates start to shift–destroying L.A. in the process–Jackson and his family begin a desperate journey of escape and survival by land, water, and air hoping to see the new world.

To be fair, the special and visual effects do not dominate entirely the narrative, which unnecessarily runs two hours and forty minutes. In fact, it takes almost a whole reel before the first action piece is inserted. By my count, about half of the movie consists of visual effects. The sheer number of different types of disasters that happen in “2012″ must be record-breaking, and the whole schlocky film feels like it was designed to surpass any previous disaster film in history.

The CGI begin on a relatively and reasonably small scale before escalating to the kinds of proportions, in which size rather quality or impact is the determining factor. In one of the first scenes, Kate is trapped as her local grocery store is ripped to shreds by a major earthquake. In the course of the film, there are more earthquakes, fissures opening in the ground, several cities destroyed, powerfully sweeping floods, huge volcanic eruptions. Among the bigger, more impressive set-pieces are the destruction of L.A. in a 10.5 earthquake, and Yellowstone Park going up in a 20-mile-wide explosion of lava.

Additionally, the production team has built a few outdoor “shaky floor” stages, giant sets built on gimbals that director Emmerich could move as his actors ran through. For example, an entire city street with palm trees, concrete, and facades of houses, was put on huge gimbals and movers.

It will not be an exaggeration to say that “2012″ is mass entertainment based on mass destruction.

November 3, 2009

Women in Trouble


Women in Trouble (2009) Poster

One day in the lives of ten seemingly disparate women — including a porn star, a flight attendant, a psychiatrist, a masseuse, a bartender and a pair of call girls — all with one thing in common: trouble. Elektra Luxx is a world-famous porn star whose future is thrown for a loop with the news that she’s pregnant. Holly Rocket is a not-too-bright adult industry newcomer with an inconvenient aversion to girl-girl action. Their paths intersect with, among others, a hilariously suave British Rock Star, a bright neurotic with a dark past and a call girl with a tricky client.

Production Status: In Production/Awaiting Release
Logline: One day in the lives of ten desperate women with one thing in common: trouble.
Genres: Comedy and Drama
Running Time: 1 hr. 35 min.
Release Date: November 13th, 2009 (limited)
MPAA Rating: R for sexual content including strong dialogue, and for language.
Distributors:
Screen Media Films
Production Co.:
Gato Negro Films
Produced in: United States
What does it take to make a good, honest comedy driven by a cast completely comprised by women? And I’m not talking about movies like Sex and the City — which was probably better than I will ever admit — or romantic comedies that have strong female characters, such as When Harry Met Sally. I’m talking about a genuinely honest, even though it’s at times a bit campy, dramedy driven by an all-female cast. A film that doesn’t paint its female characters into a series of specific clichés, but makes them rich, fleshed out (pun intended) women who really jump off the screen. As far as I’m concerned, very few have actually figured out how to do it, especially in recent history.And it was pretty evident that writer/director Sebastian Gutierrez was a bit nervous about his own ability to do it as well. During his introduction of his film Women in Trouble, Gutierrez went as far as to jokingly say that if certain scenes included some obviously bad acting and it was funny, that is how it was meant to be. A safe guard, just in case his brand of humor in this film — which is very different from the stuff he’s written before in Snakes on a Plane, Gothika, etc. — didn’t quite pan out. And don’t tell him I said this or anything, but it all worked perfectly, igniting some roaring laughter from the crowd at the Paramount theater and solidifying Women in Trouble as one of the first films I’ve seen in a long time to actually treat its female characters seriously, even when they are caught in some silly situations.The film essentially tells the story of ten seemingly desperate women, all with their own unique sets of problems, many of whom collide into each other on their journey through one incredibly odd day. There is a world famous porn star named Electra Luxx (Carla Gugino), who has just found out that she is pregnant with the child of a wild British drummer — brought to life by an awesome performance from Josh Brolin. And just as she is finding out this news, her future baby daddy is attempting to woo a sexy flight attendant (Marley Shelton) as he returns from what sounds like a busted tour with his band. But before Electra can get in touch with him, she finds herself trapped in an elevator with Doris (Connie Britton), a semi-neurotic women who is trapped by her own dark past that involves her clever, spry niece Charlotte, played by Gutierrez’s daughter Isabella. These gals seem to comprise the core of the story, but around them are several very interesting and memorable characters, including a pair of star-crossed ladies of the night, played by the hilarious Adrianne Palicki and the ever-gorgeous Emmanuelle Chriqui. There is also Maxine, played by Sarah Clarke, a therapist who connects many of the characters together. She’s just discovered that her husband Travis (Simon Baker) has been cheating on her with Addy (Caitlin Keats), the sister of the aforementioned Doris.It gets a little complicated in explanation, but trust me when I say that all the pieces fit perfectly when arranged on screen. It is truly amazing to discover that this film was shot in 10 days with actors coming and going on an almost volunteer basis. It gives not-so-new meaning to doing things on the fly. Essentially, it is a bunch of talented Hollywood friends getting together and making a movie just because they can, and the end result is a very funny film that gets to dramatic depths that you don’t expect. It rests, as its director would tell you, on the shoulders of these women. And while I think that he’s not taking enough credit for his great creative vision for the project, I would tend to agree that a few of these women really shine. Most notable is Adrianen Palicki, who plays a ditzy porn star who is having trouble with some of her girl-girl scenes. You see, she vomits every time she gets in close contact with another woman’s woo-woo. And at the core of her issue, as she explains to a super-cute Canadian masseuse played by Cameron Richardson later in the movie, is an embarrassing childhood story. It’s one of those stories, and topics, that would not work at all if it weren’t handled correctly, would come off as completely ridiculous. But Palicki pulls it off perfectly with a healthy mix of sweetness and subtlety.The emotional weight of the film seems to rest on the shoulders of Carla Gugino, whose character Electra Luxx will be part of a trilogy, and Connie Britton. Their scenes together deal with some of the film’s very serious topics — motherhood, love, dark pasts and rubber vaginas to name a few. They have some very emotional moments in the film, many of which really add some beautiful layers to the film, but they also have a ten minute conversation about the popularity of the Electra Luxx designer vagina, in their underwear. I am convinced that there is something for everyone in this movie.I would also be missing big if I didn’t mention the precocious, darling performance of Isabella Gutierrez. She’s in this movie for more than just a “take your daughter to work day” element, as she proves quickly that she’s got some chops. As Charlotte, she is a darker, smarter character than anything we’ve seen from a teenage actress in a long time. Think about Abagail Breslin’s character in Little Miss Sunshine, then add a few years, mix in some sharp wit and add a weird Wiccan element and you’ve got Charlotte pegged.Overall this feels like one of those special little films that is the start of something really great. Gutierrez has already shot his second film in the series, Electra Luxx, with plans for the third film currently in the works. And if the next two are anything like this one, rich with laughs and tears and dimensions previously not thought possible with a completely female cast (not because it couldn’t be done, but because it just hasn’t been done), then I am totally in for the long haul. In fact, it wouldn’t be any trouble to get me to revisit the story of these fine women any time soon. And I mean that in the least sexist way — although, I must disclose the Carla Gugino, Adrianne Palicki and Emmanuelle Chriqui in their underwear will always do the trick. What can I say? I’m a simple man.

Uncertainty

Uncertainty (2009) Poster

What if? A couple at a crossroads in their relationship, facing, one fateful July 4, the seemingly simple decision between a family barbecue or dim sum in Chinatown. Splitting the tale in two, exploring what happens as the couple follow both options and the consequences of making a choice–or not.

production status: in production/awaiting release
genres: drama and holiday
release date: november 13th, 2009 (fixed)
distributors:
ifc films
production co. :
kino-korsakoff
filming locatings:
new york, new york usa
new york city, new york, usa
produced in: united states

Download synopsis: since their childhood, antnio, the son of a rich and fine family, and jos, the son of a house maid, shared everything beneath her watchful eye. When they grew up, their flirtations only drew. . . Since their childhood, antnio, the son of a rich and fine family, and jos, the son of a house maid, shared everything beneath her watchful eye. When they grew up, their flirtations only drew them closer: antnio married camila, with whom jos, the blue bull, had always been in love. And antnio has vanessa as his mistress, and she and jos are collaborators in a shady business. But the devil never sleeps, and things go seriously for the maid who attempts to turn them away from the road of ill luck and disaster. These four lives crossed by fate will end up in the flames of hell.

Shoot for the Moon


Ten9Eight: Shoot for the Moon (2009) Poster

In America, a kid drops out of high school every 9 seconds. Imagine if they didn’t. This is the question behind award-winning filmmaker Mary Mazzio’s newest project “Ten9Eight,” a film which tells the inspirational stories of several inner city teens (of differing race, religion and ethnicity) from Harlem to Compton and all points in between, as they compete in an annual business plan competition run by the Network for Teaching Entrepreneurship (NFTE).

Genres: Documentary
Running Time: 1 hr. 25 min.
Release Date: November 13th, 2009 (limited)
Distributors:
50 Eggs Films

Synopsis: George Dunlap (Albert Finney) and his wife, Faith (Diane Keaton), two well-educated, freethinking products of the 1960s, appear to have it all: a beautiful house, four healthy daughters, and money… George Dunlap (Albert Finney) and his wife, Faith (Diane Keaton), two well-educated, freethinking products of the 1960s, appear to have it all: a beautiful house, four healthy daughters, and money in the bank. But looks can be deceiving, and in truth their marriage took a turn for the worse years ago. Fed up with the sporadic feuds and the facade of happiness, George walks out on his family and moves in with his girlfriend, Sandy (Karen Allen). Faith also seeks new romance and falls for a local contractor, Frank (Peter Weller). Their daughters suffer the most, however, and both George and Faith learn that breaking up is more difficult than they imagined.A poignantly emotional drama, SHOOT THE MOON exposes the problems of an Age of Aquarius couple struggling into the era of the yuppie. Director Alan Parker (MISSISSIPPI BURNING) and screenwriter Bo Goldman closely detail the breakup of the two ultraliberals who find it difficult to live up to the responsibilities of marriage and the traditions and pressures of the American dream. Parker, as is his wont, offers a critique of contemporary culture while delivering an entertaining, memorable film. More

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress