In this unlikely and at times wrenching love story, World War II has just ended and a processing error wrongfully lands 51 German POWs in a Soviet prison camp run by women. The guards’ task of outing the SS officers hiding among the prisoners pits the men and women against each other. As the truth of the situation comes to light, hostility remains between some while love blossoms between others. IN…See Full Description
|
|
||||
Watch This Movie
Download This Movie
Alternative downloads
hoto Caption: Lt. Aldo Raine (Brad Pitt) and Sgt. Donny Donowitz (Eli Roth) in Quentin Tarantino’s Inglourious Basterds. Photo: Francois Duhamel/ TWC 2009.
Inglourious Basterds was released in theaters nationwide on August 21, 2009, the following is a retroactive review:
In an early shot, Julie (Tina Rodriguez), one of dairy farmer Perrier LaPaditeâs (Denis Minochet) daughters hangs linens on a clotheswire. The cameraâs focus on the deliberately placed strokes of her hand across the sheet telegraphs obligatory replication before we even recognize that writer/director Quentin Tarantino has lifted a scene from Sergio Leoneâs Once Upon a Time in the WestâNazis on motorcycles standing in for desperados on horseback; Mr. Minochet in the McBain role. The title card âOnce Upon a Time in Nazi-Occupied Franceâ is superfluous, but to be expected of Mr. Tarantino, who delights in regaling us with his movie store clerk mastery of insipid trivia.
Enter SS Colonel Hans Landa (Christoph Waltz), the âJew Hunter,â so named for his cinematically-cliché prescience. Convinced that LaPadite is harboring Jews, Col. Landa breaks into a laborious soliloquy on the hiding places of hawks versus rats. I wasnât aware hawks had much to hide from, but never mind. His foreknowledge withheld, the scene builds tension for minutes on end. Has it been done? Yes. Does it nonetheless generate white-knuckled suspense? Absolutely. Mr. Waltz has created a smug monster not unlike that of Ralph Fiennesâ Amon Goethe in Schindlerâs List. But there was nothing remotely comical about Goethe. Fear kept a constant level. Mr. Waltzâs dynamic performance contrasts satirical and dramatic hues, effectively charismatic and repulsive at once.
The film is a fictitious account of an assassin squad of Jewish-American soldiers handpicked by Lt. Aldo Raine (Brad Pitt), nicknamed âThe Basterds,â to infiltrate or ambush and kill German soldiers behind enemy lines in World War II. Unlike most of Mr. Tarantinoâs films, Inglourious Basterds has a mostly linear chronology. To tell two stories and connect them without tritely rearranging the narrative, and maintain suspense for two hours and thirty-three minutes is a genuine achievement for him even if riddled with the usual jump cuts, self-aware dialogue and movie triviaâamong other marks of his brand.
The second plot involves Shosanna Dreyfus (Mélanie Laurent), an escapee from the filmâs initial massacre, who inherited a movie theater. In a completely random introductionâplot machinationâshe is pestered for a date by a young German soldier, Frederick Zoller (Daniel Brühl). He turns out to be a war hero and a movie starâanalogue of Audie Murphy, the most decorated World War II veteran and star of his own autobiography, To Hell and Back. Private Zoller convinces Dr. Josef Goebbels (Sylvester Groth), the director of the propaganda film in which Zoller stars, his movie should be premiered at Shosannaâs theater. Seething yet from the massacre of her family, Dreyfus hatches a plan to eliminate most of the Nazi partyâs high command. Complicating matters, not only does the Basterdsâ operation lead them to the same conclusion, but the adept Col. Landa is always only a step behind the saboteurs. Itâs rather obvious what the outcome will be, if you know Mr. Tarantinoâs predilection toward female revenge stories. How it unfolds is of greater interest.
In those satirical characterizations, seemingly endless dialogues, recycled musical cues and ludicrously-stylized bloodbaths we receive our sacramentâcobbled-together adventure and mayhem from my generationâs favorite movie nerd. The movie is nothing more than that, nor need it be. Mr. Tarantinoâs evolution as a film maker is such that the shot-by-shot plagiarism and film school bore has somehow morphed into his own lexicon. In his prior works, replication of technique might have existed for its own sake as in the diffusely lit sequences of Kill Bill parodying Shaw Bros. flicks, or naming a chapter after an obscure, 1968 Elke Sommer film (The Wicked Dreams of Paula Schultz). Here, Mr. Tarantino learns to apply those years of mimicry with purpose. Consider Col. Landaâs protracted request to converse in English with Perrier. While poking fun at American period pieces which often begin in another language only to switch to English in the first scene, the move obfuscates Landaâs intentions from the Jews hiding under the floorboards. Later, a shot continues for a beat or two, focusing on Lt. Raineâs solitary, abashed glances after repeatedly fumbling Italian pronunciation before the multi-lingual Col. Landa. The aforementioned reliance on seeming plot omniscience is used in another scene ending in a standoff. But unlike the languid ramblings of Pulp Fiction, the sceneâs reams of dialogue ratchet the tension near, but not past, exasperation. The payoff arrives before you think to glance at your watch, despite a good twenty minutes having passed.
Only Private Zoller regrets killing so many. Yet the thought is abandoned just before his baser instincts return. The film is pure vengeance without nuance or intellectâmoral conundrums unexamined. Mr. Tarantino has a talent for such action pieces, devoid of sophistry. As Pauline Kael spoke of directors being âGenerals in the arts,â he cannot be bothered with such questions on the way to his big vision. Other than kicky violence or oddball characters including the treacherous Sgt. Hugo Stiglitz (Til Schweiger) whose reputation so precedes him as to warrant his own title card, if thereâs a reason Tarantinoâs approach works here it is the reliably-despicable Nazis. Theyâre the ultimate contrivance for conscience-free killing. Could it have worked with a different antagonist? Perhaps, but it doesnât hurt to vacate our faculties in the service of action, provided we donât fool ourselves into believing that Quentin Tarantino aims higher than Michael Bay.